




全文預(yù)覽已結(jié)束
下載本文檔
版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
以語言測試學(xué)理論為基礎(chǔ)對英語口語初級水平測試的剖析摘 要:本文以語言測試學(xué)理論為基礎(chǔ),從reliability, validity and fairness三個基本因素對較為典型的英語口語初級水平測試進(jìn)行分析,為英語教學(xué)中口語測試題的設(shè)計提供了參考 關(guān)鍵詞:語言測試學(xué)理論;英語口語 1. Purposes of the test For the teachers, the overall purposes of the elementary speaking test are to help teachers to: -understand what their students have achieved -find out students strengths and weaknesses -work out ways of helping the students -use information from the assessment as a basis for future lesson planning (Bachman & Palmer, 1996, p. 354) 2. Issues of Reliability, Validity and Fairness 2. 1 Reliability of the Speaking Test Reliability is concerned about the “consistency of test judgement and results” (Davies, 1990, p. 21) and reliability of a test involves both that of a test itself and that of scoring of the test (Fernandez, 1996, p.114). In order to make the speaking test more reliable, the following methods will be used to achieve consistent performances from test-takers and the scorer reliability. As for the speaking test itself, first of all, other things being equal, the more items that a test has, the more reliable that test will be. So each item in this speaking test will represent a fresh start for the test-takers, in this way, the test-takers will be given as many “fresh starts” as possible (Hughes, 2003, pp. 44-45). And clear and explicit instructions will be read clearly from a short prepared text in order to avoid introducing confusion (Luoma, 2004, pp. 168-169). Furthermore, to maximize reliability, the interview will be tightly structured to control what the interviewer can do. (Ingram & Wylie, 1993, p. 224) 2. 2 Validity of the Speaking Test Validity is also the important quality of a test which means that a test measures accurately what it intends to measure. In other words, score of the test must be a meaningful indicator of the particular individuals ability that it intends to measure (Bachman, 1990, p. 25). To address the construct validity in this speaking test, content relevance and coverage is quite necessary which means linking the specification directly to the learning objective of the syllabus and providing a high degree of content relevance (Bachman & Palmer, 1996, pp. 356-357). 2. 3 Fairness of the Speaking Test Fairness is an important consideration in all aspects of testing and the tests must ensure that all “test takers are given comparable opportunity to demonstrate what they know and how they can perform in the area being tested.” (Joint Committee on Testing Practices, 2004, p. 2) This speaking test is fair to all the test-takers because test bias is avoided when designing this speaking test. First, all the test-takers are from the same cultural background. They are all junior middle school students in China and educated in the same educational system. Second, all the test-takers have similar background knowledge. As the structures and vocabulary in the speaking test topics are based on their textbook Go for it and the topics themselves are in familiar communication context of their daily life. References: 1. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2. Bachman, L.F. & Palmer, A.S. (1996). Language testing in practice: designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 3. Davies, P. (1990). Principles of language testing. Oxford: Arnold. 4. Fernandez, A. J. (1996). A close test for advanced students. RESLA, 11, 109-115. 5. Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 6. Ingram, D. E & Wylie, E. (1993). Assessing speaking proficiency in the international English language testing system. In Douglas, D. & Chapelle, C. (Eds). A new decade of language testing research: selected papers from the 1990 language testing research colloquium. Virginia: World Composition Services, Inc., Sterling. 7. Luoma, S. (2004). Asse
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 哈爾濱2024高三數(shù)學(xué)試卷
- 海納教育數(shù)學(xué)試卷
- 河?xùn)|一年級數(shù)學(xué)試卷
- 2025-2030年中國郵件輸送分揀系統(tǒng)項目投資可行性研究分析報告
- 2025年中國汽車外部清洗機(jī)行業(yè)市場發(fā)展前景及發(fā)展趨勢與投資戰(zhàn)略研究報告
- 2025年中國冷凍離心機(jī)行業(yè)發(fā)展監(jiān)測及投資戰(zhàn)略規(guī)劃研究報告
- 軌枕墊行業(yè)深度研究分析報告(2024-2030版)
- 2024年中國精制鎳行業(yè)市場調(diào)查報告
- 2025年中國選礦機(jī)械行業(yè)市場行情動態(tài)研究報告
- 健康用藥課件圖片素材
- 社區(qū)社會工作課件
- 《國際貿(mào)易理論與實務(wù)》考試復(fù)習(xí)題庫(含答案)
- 浙江省杭州市拱墅區(qū)2025年中考英語一模試卷(含筆試答案無聽力答案、原文及音頻)
- 2025-2030全球及中國綜合設(shè)施管理(IFM)行業(yè)市場現(xiàn)狀供需分析及投資評估規(guī)劃分析研究報告
- 公路工程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)施工招標(biāo)文件第八章-工程量清單計量規(guī)則(2018年版)
- 看場工作合同協(xié)議
- 營運客車安全例行檢查規(guī)范
- 出口空運知識培訓(xùn)課件
- 工藝驗證檢查指南2025
- 安徽亳州譙城在建風(fēng)電場項目“9.5”較大高處墜落事故調(diào)查報告警示教育專題學(xué)習(xí)
- 預(yù)防給藥錯誤
評論
0/150
提交評論