可行性研究Chapter6ppt課件.pptx

TheFeasibilityStudyofInvestmentProject,Ren,LingSchoolofManagement,JilinUniversity,Chapter6Technology,EquipmentandEngineeringProgram,Technology,equipmentandengineeringformthemainbodyofprojectandtheimportantevidencetojudgewhethertheprojectiseconomicallyreasonable-TechnologySelection-MajorEquipmentSelection-EngineeringProgramSelection,TechnologySelection技術(shù)方案選擇,Referstoproductionapproachesandtechnologyprocessprocedures,etc,AdvancementSuitabilityReliabilitySafetyEconomicalreasonability,ProductionApproach生產(chǎn)方法選擇,AdvancementanddevelopmenttrendofdomesticandinternationalproductionapproachesSuitabilityforthespecificrawmaterialAvailabilityofthetechnologytobeappliedMeettherequirementofcleanproductionandresourcesaving,TechnologyProcessProcedureSelection工藝流程方案選擇,SecuritytotheproductqualityProcessconnectionsinthetechnologyflowReasonableconsumptionquotatoincreasetheyieldMajortechnologicalparameters,suchaspressure,temperature,vacuum,speed,andpurityReasonableprocesssequencetoboththestabilityofmajorprocessandflexibilityofproductchoiceonmarketrequirement,TechnologyComparison技術(shù)方案比選,Advancement技術(shù)的先進(jìn)程度Reliability技術(shù)的可靠程度Securityofproductqualityandcharacteristics技術(shù)對(duì)產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量性能的保證程度Suitabilitytothespecifiedrawmaterials技術(shù)對(duì)原材料的適應(yīng)性Processreasonability工藝流程的合理性Automationstandard自動(dòng)化控制水平Availabilityofthetechnology技術(shù)獲得的難易程度Impactontheenvironment對(duì)環(huán)境的影響程度Economicindicators技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)指標(biāo),MajorEquipmentSelection主要設(shè)備方案選擇,Chosetheequipmentbasedonthedeterminationoftechnology,bystudyingthespecification,model,quantity,origin,andprice,ProductionequipmentPowerequipmentConductionequipmentTransportationequipmentResearchequipmentManagementequipmentPublicequipment,Scopeofmajorequipmentselection,Proposedspecification,modelandquantityofmajorequipmentaccordingtothescale,productschemeandtechnologyAstatementofsourceandpriceofrequiredequipmentsupplySupplyofequipmentifithastobeimportedTransportationandinstallationmeasureforextremesize,weight,andheightEquipmentmodifyprogramfortechnicalinnovationproject,MethodsofMajorEquipmentSelection設(shè)備方案比選方法,1.設(shè)備綜合效率分析法,設(shè)備綜合效率,設(shè)備壽命周期效益,設(shè)備壽命周期費(fèi)用,權(quán)重評(píng)分法,例：某項(xiàng)目設(shè)備方案有三種類(lèi)型，各設(shè)備的壽命周期費(fèi)用分別為：甲設(shè)備15.6萬(wàn)元，乙設(shè)備16萬(wàn)元，丙設(shè)備15.8萬(wàn)元。根據(jù)各種資料測(cè)定的設(shè)備壽命周期效益權(quán)重與得分如表：,2.追加投資回收期法,例：某項(xiàng)目有兩種可供選擇的設(shè)備方案，其中：A設(shè)備初始投資為8000元，年使用費(fèi)用為2400元；B設(shè)備初始投資為11000元，每年使用費(fèi)為1900元，基準(zhǔn)投資回收期為10年，試確定最優(yōu)設(shè)備方案,3.最小費(fèi)用法,年費(fèi)用法（AC）年費(fèi)用設(shè)備初始投資額資金回收系數(shù)+年維持費(fèi)用總費(fèi)用法（PC）總費(fèi)用設(shè)備初始投資額+年維持費(fèi)用折現(xiàn)系數(shù),例：某項(xiàng)目有兩種可供選擇的設(shè)備方案，其中：A設(shè)備初始投資為8000元，年使用費(fèi)用為2400元；B設(shè)備初始投資為11000元，每年使用費(fèi)為1900元；兩設(shè)備使用壽命均為10年，折現(xiàn)率為10，試確定最優(yōu)設(shè)備方案,Majorequipmentstatement主要設(shè)備表,EngineeringProgramSelection工程方案選擇,Concerningthebuildingsonthebaseofthedeterminationofscale,technologyandequipment,FunctionalrequirementofproductionRequirementofsiteplanningorlinedirectionEngineeringstandardandconventionEconomicalreasonability,Majorbuildingitemstatement主要建筑物構(gòu)筑物一覽表,EnergyandWaterSavingMeasures節(jié)能與節(jié)水措施,Ifenergy(water)consumptionofaprojectissubstantial,theenergy(water)savingmeasureshouldbeexplained.Evaluatetheenergy(water)consumptionindicatorsoftheprojectontheassumptionoftakingenergy(water)s