高中英語演講稿我的分數(shù)觀_第1頁
高中英語演講稿我的分數(shù)觀_第2頁
高中英語演講稿我的分數(shù)觀_第3頁
高中英語演講稿我的分數(shù)觀_第4頁
免費預覽已結(jié)束,剩余1頁可下載查看

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

1、.高中英語演講稿我的分數(shù)觀my attitude towards to marks 我的分數(shù)觀 for our students, marks is above everything. teachers will judge us from our marks. with marks we can be enrolled into junior middle schools. with marks, we can be enrolled into senior middle schools. with marks we can be enrolled into college. with ma

2、rks we can be enrolled into postgraduate and doctrine studies. still with marks we can be graded and be allowed to go abroad for further studies. our parents will be strict with us with the marks. our society judge us from marks. however, sometimes we students compare one another with marks directly

3、. we are completely controlled by marks. we like them and we feel sorry for them. but what attitude towards our marks should we take? truly, marks functions cannot be underestimated. in terms of test in our study, marks are fair and real. that is the reason why we say "everyone is equal before

4、marks. " however, i think marks are the sole standard to judge the success or failure of students in exams. sometimes, marks more than ten or less than one or two in our exams comparing with others mean not everything. the success or failure in exams will be influenced by experience on the spot

5、 and the examinee's health etc. once in a while one cannot fail in exams. " success or failure is common sense for military. " i think everyone is familiar with the famous saying. don't you think such will be the case with our study? in exams, one cannot be " never-defeated ge

6、neral" . even though one will be very good in everyday study, he cannot succeed in every exam sometimes. we can get proof from the fact that the very best one we call "number one scholar" in the entrance exams for college and ordinary middle school and specialized secondary school ove

7、r the years is not eminent above all others nor top student in every study. as a matter of fact, "high marks" and "ability" are not unified. some time ago, a new phrase " high marks but poor competence" came into being. once i happened to meet such a teacher as this .it

8、 is said that the teacher just graduated from a far-famed key university. but his teaching result is much less than that of the one who just graduated from a not-well-renowned college. when lecturing, the teacher only repeated what the text-books says, which was very dull so the his students' in

9、terest in learning was not aroused. his teaching was short of unity of teaching and learning. at present there is a fact that we know a few brilliant and top college graduates are not qualified for their posts. the reason for it may be lack of the ability to combine knowledge learnt from books with

10、pragmatics in their work. students of this kind will be successful in every exam but they will be able to use freely their knowledge in their posts. don't you think it waste training such persons for the country? to sum up from the above, i can say marks are not absolutely authoritative for some

11、. if we neglect training and developing the students' ability and competence and if we only seek for the high marks, we will be absolutely wrong. we should take an objective attitude towards the marks. neither should we neglect them nor should we overvalue them like a god. 分數(shù),對于我們學生來說,是至關(guān)重要的了。老師

12、要用分數(shù)來衡量我們上初中,要分數(shù);上高中,要分數(shù);上大學要分數(shù),考研究生、博士要分數(shù),出國、評職稱還是要分數(shù)。家長要用分數(shù)來要求我們;社會用分數(shù)來衡量我們。而我們自己也常常用分數(shù)在互相直接做著攀比。我們完全為分數(shù)所左右了,我們?yōu)樗鼩g喜,我們?yōu)樗鼏蕷?。那么,我們?yīng)該怎樣對待分數(shù)呢? 確實,分數(shù)有它不可低估的作用。從檢驗學習的角度上來說,它具有一定的公平性和真實性,“分數(shù)面前人人平等,講的就是這個道理。然而,分數(shù)并不是估量一個學生成敗得失的惟一標準??荚嚦煽兣紶柕土艘粌煞帜酥潦畞矸?,并不一定說明什么問題。考試的成敗有時也會受到諸如臨場經(jīng)歷、安康狀況等方面的影響。“勝敗乃是兵家常事這句話大概不會有人不知道,而我們在學習上又何嘗不如此?在考試上很少有“常勝之師,即使平時成績再好的同學,也難免會有偶爾的失誤。歷屆中考、高考“狀元并非就是平時出類拔萃的優(yōu)等生的事實,便是明證。 事實上,“高分與“才能往往是不統(tǒng)一的。前段時間,社會上出現(xiàn)了一個新詞:“高分低能。筆者就曾經(jīng)碰見這樣一位老師,據(jù)說他畢業(yè)于某赫赫有名的重點大學,但從教學效果上講,卻遠遠遜色于一些非高等學府畢業(yè)的老師。其授課只是照本宣讀而已,枯燥乏味,缺乏一種教與學之間的協(xié)調(diào)功能。根本不能引起聽課同學的興趣,目前不少大中專院

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文庫網(wǎng)僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論